General Personal Injury FAQs — La Paloma Addition

• ❓Do I have to take a low offer or can we fight for a better result?
  You never have to accept a lowball. We negotiate hard with insurers, and when needed we move toward a multi-million dollar verdict from 36th Judicial District Court. Our case histories include results such as 955K. The goal is simple: fair compensation for your losses in La Paloma Addition.
• ❓The insurance company says my treatment wasn’t necessary — do I have options?
  Absolutely. Carriers (e.g., Loya Insurance Group) often second-guess medical care to cut payouts. For clients such as a restaurant delivery driver with fractured humerus, we use treating-physician opinions, imaging, and billing audits to prove care was reasonable and related to the crash.
• ❓What should I do if Bristol West says “You didn’t miss enough work to qualify for compensation.” after my La Paloma Addition crash?
  Insurers like Bristol West often use lines such as “You didn’t miss enough work to qualify for compensation.” to stall or minimize claims. Even injuries like Galeazzi fracture can be life-changing. In La Paloma Addition, we gather medical proof, challenge delay tactics, and, if needed, push for a multi-million dollar verdict from 36th Judicial District Court — outcomes in our files include results up to 1.41M.
• ❓An adjuster told me “You didn’t follow doctor’s orders..” Can a La Paloma Addition personal injury lawyer still help?
  Yes. Adjusters regularly say “You didn’t follow doctor’s orders.,” even when liability and damages are strong. We document fault with police reports, witnesses, and experts, then negotiate with carriers like Nationwide. If they won’t deal fairly, we prepare for a jury award issued in civil trial at 36th Judicial District Court and pursue full compensation.
• ❓Will a gap in my medical care ruin my case in La Paloma Addition?
  Not necessarily. Life, work, and delayed onset symptoms happen. We explain the timeline and connect you with appropriate providers. When adjusters say “We’re waiting on a supervisor’s approval.,” we counter with consistent documentation so the insurer can’t weaponize normal scheduling gaps.
• ❓How do I respond if the adjuster claims my injuries were pre-existing?
  Even if you had prior issues, the law in La Paloma Addition allows recovery when a crash aggravates a condition. We show the before/after difference with records and expert testimony — critical for injuries like vertebral fracture. Don’t accept “There’s a coverage issue we’re reviewing.” at face value.