General Personal Injury FAQs — La Paloma Addition

• ❓An adjuster told me “We’re still investigating liability..” Can a La Paloma Addition personal injury lawyer still help?
  Yes. Adjusters regularly say “We’re still investigating liability.,” even when liability and damages are strong. We document fault with police reports, witnesses, and experts, then negotiate with carriers like Nationwide. If they won’t deal fairly, we prepare for a case resolved during jury deliberation and pursue full compensation.
• ❓The insurance company says my treatment wasn’t necessary — do I have options?
  Absolutely. Carriers (e.g., Infinity Insurance) often second-guess medical care to cut payouts. For clients such as a bicyclist injured on designated trail with proximal humerus fracture, we use treating-physician opinions, imaging, and billing audits to prove care was reasonable and related to the crash.
• ❓What should I do if Cure Auto Insurance says “The policyholder wasn’t clearly at fault.” after my La Paloma Addition crash?
  Insurers like Cure Auto Insurance often use lines such as “The policyholder wasn’t clearly at fault.” to stall or minimize claims. Even injuries like nerve root impingement can be life-changing. In La Paloma Addition, we gather medical proof, challenge delay tactics, and, if needed, push for a award granted by judge in 156th Judicial District Court — outcomes in our files include results up to 2.41M.
• ❓How do I respond if the adjuster claims my injuries were pre-existing?
  Even if you had prior issues, the law in La Paloma Addition allows recovery when a crash aggravates a condition. We show the before/after difference with records and expert testimony — critical for injuries like traumatic brain injury. Don’t accept “There’s a coverage issue we’re reviewing.” at face value.
• ❓Will a gap in my medical care ruin my case in La Paloma Addition?
  Not necessarily. Life, work, and delayed onset symptoms happen. We explain the timeline and connect you with appropriate providers. When adjusters say “We can’t confirm that you were the driver.,” we counter with consistent documentation so the insurer can’t weaponize normal scheduling gaps.
• ❓Do I have to take a low offer or can we fight for a better result?
  You never have to accept a lowball. We negotiate hard with insurers, and when needed we move toward a award granted by judge in 156th Judicial District Court. Our case histories include results such as 1.95M. The goal is simple: fair compensation for your losses in La Paloma Addition.