General Personal Injury FAQs — Pointe A La Hache

• ❓How do I respond if the adjuster claims my injuries were pre-existing?
  Even if you had prior issues, the law in Pointe A La Hache allows recovery when a crash aggravates a condition. We show the before/after difference with records and expert testimony — critical for injuries like burns (2nd or 3rd degree). Don’t accept “You can’t prove emotional distress.” at face value.
• ❓Do I have to take a low offer or can we fight for a better result?
  You never have to accept a lowball. We negotiate hard with insurers, and when needed we move toward a jury returned a favorable verdict in 25th Judicial District Court. Our case histories include results such as 1.49M. The goal is simple: fair compensation for your losses in Pointe A La Hache.
• ❓An adjuster told me “There’s a coverage issue we’re reviewing..” Can a Pointe A La Hache personal injury lawyer still help?
  Yes. Adjusters regularly say “There’s a coverage issue we’re reviewing.,” even when liability and damages are strong. We document fault with police reports, witnesses, and experts, then negotiate with carriers like National General. If they won’t deal fairly, we prepare for a binding arbitration resulted in favorable award and pursue full compensation.
• ❓What should I do if Erie Insurance says “We’re still investigating liability.” after my Pointe A La Hache crash?
  Insurers like Erie Insurance often use lines such as “We’re still investigating liability.” to stall or minimize claims. Even injuries like compartment syndrome can be life-changing. In Pointe A La Hache, we gather medical proof, challenge delay tactics, and, if needed, push for a jury returned a favorable verdict in 25th Judicial District Court — outcomes in our files include results up to 1.51M.
• ❓Will a gap in my medical care ruin my case in Pointe A La Hache?
  Not necessarily. Life, work, and delayed onset symptoms happen. We explain the timeline and connect you with appropriate providers. When adjusters say “The bills are higher than reasonable market value.,” we counter with consistent documentation so the insurer can’t weaponize normal scheduling gaps.
• ❓The insurance company says my treatment wasn’t necessary — do I have options?
  Absolutely. Carriers (e.g., Travelers) often second-guess medical care to cut payouts. For clients such as a commuter hit in crosswalk with avulsion fracture, we use treating-physician opinions, imaging, and billing audits to prove care was reasonable and related to the crash.